Do not convert LX3 RAW to DNG for now

17 04 2009

I think this is a very important point when considering whether to convert to DNG on import (or round-trip to DNG in order to work with the RAW files in Apple Aperture which does not support the RW2 format yet).

In a nutshell, the RW2 RAW file contains additional metadata which  allows certain manufacturers to compensate for issues with their lenses; in the case of the LX3 it seems this information contains information to compensate for barrel distortion.  The DNG specification does not allow for this additional metadata at this time although Adobe has been very transparent about this and is planning on including it in future releases.  So when you convert your LX3 RAW file to DNG, essentially what it is doing is demosaicing the file and creating a linear DNG which explains the size jump of about 3 times the RAW file.

As this data is demosaiced, and therefor not a true reflection of raw sensor data; my advice if you are round-tripping your LX3 files to DNG in Aperture or have DNG conversion as part of your long term archival strategy is to keep your RW2 files.   If you demosaic the file you are losing information, this is fine post processing when you are happy with your adjustments however this is not an optimal thing to be doing when importing your file.

Here is a snippet from Adobe:

With the release of Camera Raw 5.2 (and upcoming release of Adobe Photoshop Lightroom® 2.2), there is an important exception in DNG file handling for the Panasonic DMC-LX3, Panasonic DMC-FX150, Panasonic DMC-FZ28, Panasonic DMC-G1, and Leica D-LUX 4. For those who choose to convert these native, proprietary files to the DNG file format, a linear DNG format is the only conversion option available at this time. A linear DNG file has gone through a demosaic process that converts a single mosaic layer of red, green, and blue channel information into three distinct layers, one for each channel. The resulting linear DNG file is approximately three times the size of a mosaic DNG file or the original proprietary file format.

This exception is a temporary solution to help ensure that Panasonic’s and Leica’s intended image rendering from their proprietary raw file format is applied to an image when converted DNG files are viewed in third-party software titles. The same image-rendering process is applied automatically in Camera Raw 5.2 and in Photoshop Lightroom 2.2 when viewing the original proprietary raw file format.

In a future release, Adobe plans to update the DNG specification to include an option to embed metadata-based representations of the lens compensations in the DNG file, allowing a mosaic DNG conversion. In the interim, Adobe recommends only converting these files to DNG to allow compatibility with third-party raw converters, previous versions of the Camera Raw plug-in, or previous versions of Photoshop Lightroom.





Is Apple’s Silence hurting Aperture?

12 04 2009

It’s been months now, Picasa and ACDSee support the Panasonic Lumix LX3 but we have yet to have any love from Apple. Apple released some nifty new features in their consumer iPhoto 09, gimmicky but nice nonetheless. The silence has fallen over the halls of Aperture development however and the place seems shut up tighter than the dusty tombs of Moria. It’s kinda like Steve went home for a few months and left the Aperture developers locked in the basement.

Twitter, being the largest live database on the Internet at the moment is a great place to gauge the mood of photographers; try Aperture update or Aperture LX3 or Aperture vs Lightroom as search criteria and you can’t help but notice a strong undercurrent of frustration.

It’s not that I’m asking for a shiny new version of Aperture (which would be nice) but rather the simple plea that the program I love and have invested an inordinate amount of time getting to know at least keeps up with Picasa or ACDsee in RAW support. It’s the never-ending eternal secrecy that shrouds everything that Apple does which is what I’m sick of. Let us know there is a problem, or not – we’re big people, we can handle it.

I suppose I could round trip the RW2 files to DNG in Lightroom (which is getting a lot of love from me at the moment) but even with compression and not embedding the original RAW data into the file it seems to blow the file up from 12M to around 33M, an unacceptable 3x jump which I just can’t do at the moment in my limited land of precious HD space.

I don’t think Apple realises just how many people have made the jump to Lightroom recently because of their silence, or how many people are teetering on the edge.





DNG – My long term archival strategy

31 12 2008

Digital NegativeI have settled on Lightroom Aperture (update) as my photo management software of choice and Adobe’s DNG format as my long term photographic archive of choice.

My Nikon shoots raw NEF files but those waiting for the recent versions of Adobe and Apple camera raw to support the D700 NEF files showed me that not all NEF’s are created equal.  Combine this with the fact that my Fujifilm shoots it’s own bizarre propriety RAW format (thankfully still understood by Lightroom) and I reckon there is an impending disaster lurking somewhere down the line.

Enter the Digital Negative (DNG) and it’s groundswell of support by software vendors (Apple, Extensis) and camera manufacturers (Leica, Hasselblad, Ricoh and Samsung) amongst others.

DNG is a RAW container format designed to hold RAW data and, more importantly for me, the file metadata.  This eliminates the need for me to have separate sidecar metadata files and it means that all my non-destructive adjustments, keywords and other metadata are available across all the tools I use.  The DNG conversion process, either through Lightroom or the free converter, is very user friendly and the original RAW file and the sidecar updates are combined into the one DNG file.

image

As DNG employs more sophisticated compression algorithms there is invariably a space saving when converting from a RAW format like NEF to DNG.   If you’re concerned about being able to open your original RAW image in the future in the proprietary camera software (like the dreadful Capture NX) then you can embed a bit-for-bit copy of your RAW data into the DNG which you can extract later.

I am in the process of converting all my NEF files (and other RAW formats) to DNG; this gives me some level of comfort that in 15 years time the files will still be accessible and relevant to the software of the time.

Read more about DNG on the Adobe website.